Grand Cards: Ryan Perry
Showing posts with label Ryan Perry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ryan Perry. Show all posts

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Some Early Ginter Returns

There are six cards in the Tigers team set. Guess how many relics there are? Yeah*














*Ok, so maybe there are only 5. You see, there are two Austin Jackson cards--one with a jersey and one with a bat--but they are actually the same card. Same card number, same picture, same everything except for the little swatch. To me this is only one card, with your choice of how you want your one square inch of memorabilia, but I could see how some people would want both.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

More Wantlist Whittling

It's been a good couple of week for me on the wantlist front. Today I get to chop three more off of my Big Ten list (although nothing quite as dramatic as last time)

Let's go in reverse order this time.

#11: Popeye Aah-guh-guh-guh-guh-guh
2010 Topps Gold #575 Ryan Perry (#/2010)

#10: The Gambler
2008 Topps - Gold Foil #634 Kenny Rogers

That card completes my 2008 Topps Gold Foil set!

...And, the leader in the clubhouse for Tigers card of the year, perhaps?
#4: Paws
2010 Topps Opening Day #M9 Paws

That's the last card I needed from 2010 Topps Opening Day too!

I'm hoping to spend a little time (and very little money) knocking out some more off of this list on my little winter break, and until I can do a proper inventory of my cards, these ones are going to be replaced by TBAs for now.

Monday, June 14, 2010

The Beauty (?) of the Sticker Autograph

Topps Series 2, like all the Topps series since 2006, I think, maybe 2005, has sticker autographs. I erroneously stated that I thought the tide had turned, however, with a Ryan Perry autograph that appeared, somewhat awkwardly, to be on-card:


I had mixed, but skewed positive feelings on this. On the one hand: ON CARD AUTOGRAPHS WOOOO!, on the other, this is the aesthetic equivalent of a sticker, almost looking worse, as though they ran out of stickers and just went "oh, just sign in this huge white box instead." Still, I was excited for the future, with the appearance that on-card autographs were in the offing. Nope:


Indeed, this is a clear sticker, which means that Topps has officially caught up with early 00's technology. Still, the clear sticker is an improvement, in that it gives you the ability to design a card in which the autograph enhances the design, or at least unobtrusively comes into play, instead of yelling "BAM! I'M AN AUTOGRAPH" the way the old cards did. As Upper Deck proved time and time again, stickers can be done nicely:



The plus side, of course, is that stickers do give the flexibility to more easily produce cards of stars without having to worry about signing schedules and production dates and the like. The downside is that they are still stickers and help contribute to the overpopulation of autograph cards as a whole, foster laziness of design and pigeonhole a company to use the same players over and over again to get their money's worth.

But there is one other upside to stickers that made itself apparent in Topps Series 2:


Some might say that this is everything that is wrong with stickers, I mean, the signature is completely crooked for goodness sake. Well give George Kell a break. He is dead after all.

Seriously though, I like that we are graced with a George Kell autograph--an unexpected surprise from beyond the grave. There is a certain beauty in this. The clear stickers are also an unambiguously good move and can only lead to better things. However, Topps needs to make sure that they don't treat these new stickers as "The Answer." They are not. They are an improvement--a low-end card solution--but should be used only when necessary. I think that everybody agrees that collectors would be happy with fewer autograph cards if the ones that were out there were nicely designed and signed on-card. Topps Chrome (2009), 206, A&G, Chicle, Bowman and Heritage have already gotten the memo. Let's just hope that they stay the course.

Friday, May 7, 2010

Something Beautiful

It's been a long week and I've got a very distinct "blah" feeling right now as I watch the work hours tick down, even though I have some stuff I need to wrap up.

What would brighten my spirits?
2009 Topps 206 #FMA-3 Ryan Perry Auto

For one, this just came in the mail.

I love these framed autos and Perry has a beautiful signature. As unenthusiastic as I am about a 2010 version of 206 coming out this fall, I'll take a card like this any day of the week.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Chippin' Away

Slowly but surely my 2010 Topps needs are being satisfied. A good Saturday of mail is to thank for these:
2010 Topps #PPA-RP Ryan Perry Auto
I tend to not like sticker autographs, but for some reason they fit these Topps designs pretty well. I don't know if it's the shininess that balances out are pretty monochromatic card or what, but they're ok. That's not to say that I prefer this autograph to something that is nicely designed or on-card, but this fits in with the rest of the Peak Performance inserts and is a fine addition to the set.

The other card is the one that I'm much more excited about, and since I've showed off the front in previous posts, I thought I'd give the back a little love.

2010 Topps #1b Hank Greenberg (SP)

A few things of note:
  • They use the same picture on the back as the front--unlike the regular 2010 base cards, which have different pictures.
  • The back logo is the rounded D with "Detroit Tigers" spelled out under it, in the style of the times. The regular cards just use the "Hat D."
  • Hank was born on 1-11-11 and is on card #1.
  • Look at all the "league leader" red on the card. He was good.
  • History is important. Note how the stats jump from 1941 to 1945. Hank served during the war, and came back to help the Tigers win the World Series in 1945. He then proceeded to lead the league in HRs and RBIs the next season--after a four year hiatus.
  • Hank had one at bat in 1930 (as an 18 year old), but then didn't come back until 1933. I don't know the backstory there.

In all, I am very excited to have added this card to the set. There are a few more things that I need to chase down still, but this was the big one. The set just looks empty without card #1 in it, you know?