Grand Cards: 2003
Showing posts with label 2003. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2003. Show all posts

Friday, March 4, 2011

The Best Discontinued Set of the Last 10 Years

It's here (sorry for the delay)

I had a lot of good responses in the comments That read something like Masterpieces, Masterpieces, GOTG, Masterpieces, Goudey, something Topps did 8 years ago, and you know what? Those were right on.

UD Masterpieces was a phenomenal set--in fact, 2007 and 2008 masterpieces remain the ONLY sets that I have completed in their entirety since I returned to collecting, so, yeah. It was pretty great.

I've collected cards from Greats of the Game and I love me some Goudey (especially 2007), but they're not it either.

Then three people said "Topps All-Time Fan Favorites." Let's see: Retired players, new photographs on old card designs and on-card autographs. Yeah, I'd say that that is a recipe for fantasticness. One problem: with all the different designs, it didn't really feel like a set per se. Oh, it was cool, but it falls just short of greatness for me.

This doesn't:



That was Lance Parrish that you were looking at in my original post Lance. Parrish. Quiz time, how many mainstream, non-buyback cards does this 8x All Star, 6x Silver Slugger, 3x Gold Glove winning Catcher who sports 324 career home runs and 1000+ RBI have since he retired in 1995? 15. Four of those came out in 1996. Nine (!) came out in 2003. Was 2003 the year of Lance Parrish? Is there some reason that this borderline hall-of-famer has been effectively ignored by the hobby (who's top comparables include 3 Hall of Famers, Jorge Posada, Ron Cey, Benny Santiago and Bill Freehan), but Ty Cobb has ELEVEN cards in 2011 Topps Series 1?!?!

Oh, and that's another thing...


BILL FREEHAN MIGHT HAVE BEEN EVEN BETTER THAN PARRISH!

At least he got some love from Upper Deck, in Greats of the Game and Legendary Cuts etc.

At this point in the show, I realize that I may have digressed from my main point: Topps Retired is the best discontinued set of the last 10 years.

My reasons are twofold, and simple:

1. The cards use a modified design of each year's Topps base set, giving the set a cohesive feel that ties in nicely with the flagship Topps release

2. The checklist highlights the many, many players who were STARS, including some should-be Hall of Famers that have barely graced ANY sports cards since 2006. Right Alan?



Right.

I've got LOTSLOTSLOTS more to say about this fantastic set and how it compares to things nowadays after the jump.

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Exorcise

The Tigers are playing their worst stretch of baseball since 2003. Yes, that 2003.

Demons, begone!


Out of Miguel's bat, you vile 1B spirit!



Away from our pitchers' arms, so that they may throw strikes again!



You may NOT induce our promising outfielders to become disappointing failures!

GET OUT OF MY 2010 TIGERS, DEMONS! THERE WILL BE NO MORE TALK OF 2003! YOU WILL CEASE HAUNTING US!


Why these demons in particular? They're a few of the $0.10 cards I picked up at the National. God help us if I actually dig into the pile of cards from 2003...

Sunday, August 1, 2010

It Could Be Worse

Still stewing over the last two days of managerial ineptitude? Chin up folks, things have been tough for all of us in Tigertown, I know. The team seems to find new ways to break your heart or disappoint you day in and day out. But remember this there's always tomorrow (in this case, in about an hour at Fenway Park, where the Tigers go for the elusive road series. I've got good vibes about Verlander today.), and it could always be worse. Lest we forget:
2003 Fleer Tradition #11 Tigers Team Leaders

The Tigers were led by a pitcher with 8 wins. Randall Simon was the leading offensive player. The season leaders have worse numbers in each category than the 2010 team leaders have Right Now with two months to go. You don't even want to know the horrors of turning the card over--the Top 5 in each category are gruesome. Oh, and that wasn't even the Tigers' bad year.

Thanks to The Brooklyn Met for putting things into perspective for me. This was just one of a handful of cards that he sent my way, all similarly depressing. Esteban Yan?!...Oy!

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Revisionist History

Don't forget, Day 1 of the Trade Away ends today at 5:30. Don't be scared away by other people's offers, you never know what might float my boat. Day 2's items will be a bit more...substantial. Check back in at 6.

With that out of the way, I want to talk about an article that popped up in the Baltimore Sun over the weekend. Perhaps you saw it. It interviews current Orioles interim manager Juan Samuel about his perception of this year's Orioles team, compared to the 2003 Tigers, for which he was also a coach. You had to figure as soon as Samuel was promoted that something like this was going to come up. It's not a surprise, nor is it in poor taste, nor is it particularly disingenuous. What jumps out at me though, are the comments flowing from Samuel himself:
"The [2003] season was not as tough as the record showed," said Samuel who worked under Detroit manager Alan Trammell. "Going into the season, there was a meeting that the staff had and they said, 'Hey guys, we have to teach. We don't expect to win. We have to teach.' We stayed positive every day and brought in guys early and saw that the guys wanted to improve. It was more about teaching. Everything — offense, defense, pitching — we had to constantly tell these guys about."

Uh, what? Are you telling me that the eye-gougingly painful baseball season that was 2003 in Detroit was "not as tough as the record showed?" If anything, it was even worse, salvaged only by winning 5 of 6 at the end of the season to stave off infamy. And don't go around telling me that there were no expectations for that team either. Granted, expectations for the Orioles this season were extremely high by comparison, but there was a lot of enthusiasm in Detroit in 2003, as Alan Trammell, Kirk Gibson and Lance Parrish all made their return to the Tigers' coaching staff. "The Oriole Way," it wasn't, but there was the thought that their collective experience could help push the Tigers back towards the realm of respectability.

The Sun article goes on to note that "three years later, the Tigers went to the World Series," and claims that the the Tigers brass credits the 2003 team for laying the groundwork. Samuel gets in it too:

"There was nothing more gratifying than to see the success even though you were not there," he said. "You know you had something to do with it. We knew that we didn't have enough to compete and we were trying to find out who were the guys that we were going to stay with when we were a championship-caliber team. What we were doing that year is we were trying to weed things out, like 'OK, we can win with this guy, we cannot win with these guys.' It was like an in-season tryout that we were doing and it paid off."

I'll let you look up exactly who was on that 2003 team, but let me just consolidate some information for you. Of the 43 players that suited up for the Tigers in 2003, Six were on the World Series team:
  • Jeremy Bonderman
  • Brandon Inge
  • Ramon Santiago (who was traded and reacquired in 2006)
  • Fernando Rodney
  • Nate Robertson
  • Jamie Walker
Mike Maroth and Dmitri Young were injured and kicked off the team mid-season, respectively, in 2006.

What I'm saying is this. The 2006 team was not successful because of the trials and tribulations of 2003. 2003 was an abject failure that did nothing but make the Tigers realize that they had no young talent in their system whatsoever and had to go out and acquire the likes of: Ivan Rodriguez, Magglio Ordonez, Placido Polanco, Carlos Guillen, Kenny Rogers and draft Justin Verlander and Joel Zumaya and develop Curtis Granderson. 2003 wasn't growing pains. It was a death march and wake-up call for the franchise.

So don't you go revising history on this Tigers fan, Juan Samuel. Don't tell me it wasn't as bad as it looked. It was. It was that bad.

As for the Orioles vs. Tigers comparisons: This Orioles season is so much worse. The optimism in Baltimore prior to the season was palpable. Adam Jones was an All-Star and Gold Glove winner (somehow). Nick Markakis had another 100 RBI season. Matt Weiters was full time. There was a bevy of pitching prospects and young hitters that had late season success with the big league squad. People were excited. That this team has fallen so flat is inexplicable. The players with track records have failed. The highly regarded prospects have failed. Management has failed. There is a full-blown baseball crisis in Baltimore, and unlike Detroit where 80-90% of the team was not even major league caliber, these Orioles, individually at least, are actually good. That's why it is so baffling.

If things continue to not get better (or, god forbid, get worse), you'll see more and more comparisons to that 2003 Tigers team. As that happens, don't get sucked in by the revisionist history that says "3 years later they made the world series!" Comparing those two teams is like comparing Apples and Poverty.

For the record, the Orioles have too much major-league proven talent and highly regarded youth to continue losing at this clip. As horrible as their pitching is, there is no way it is worse than a team who's Number 1 was Nate Cornejo who led the team's starting pitchers with an ERA of 4.67. Or that they're team batting average is going to be .240.

Don't worry O's fans, things will turn around. You actually do have the building blocks in place to be competitive in the future. It's just too bad that everybody was convinced (myself included) that this year was supposed to be the Great Leap Forward. That's one of those claims you make after the season is over. You know, revisionist history and all.

Sunday, January 3, 2010

Grand Galleries: 2003 Grandstand

In 2003 Curtis Granderson was little more than a fresh faced minor leaguer, newly removed from the friendly confines of the University of Illinois-Chicago. As such, the baseball card world included him in the obligatory minor league team set, and his performance earned him another card--Top Prospect in the Florida State League.

These two cards are from two different sets, technically. They are also the only two cards produced of Granderson in 2003. Seeing as how they're produced by the same company and use the same picture, I think they only deserve one post. Let's take a look:

2003 Grandstand: Lakeland Tigers Team Set #23 Curtis Granderson


This is an odd card, although I'll make a few comments. I love that old Lakeland Tigers logo, which has now been replaced by a less-cool Lakeland Flying Tigers logo. I love seeing Grandy wearing the stirrups, one of the few, if not the only, instances where this is the case. As for the card itself, I get it. They're trying to mimic dirt on a field, which looks crummy. Also, everything is on an angle which makes me feel like the card is miscut even though it isn't. That said, this is exactly what I think of when I think of a low-level minor league baseball card.

How about the other?
2003 Grandstand: FSL Top Prospects #22 Curtis Granderson


Ahh. Much better. Despite the fact that his stirrups are now obscured, I no longer need to tilt my head to enjoy this card. Nice little FSL logo for us to enjoy as well.

Friday, October 16, 2009

Remembering That Cup Of Coffee (Part 1)

As I mentioned in yesterday's Grand Scheme, Blake over at The Spot Starters has put together a list of notable ball players who spent a wee bit of their careers as Tigers. Here is Part One, which is recommended reading.

Being a baseball card site, I thought that it was only appropriate to profile these Tigers in cardboard form. I mean, that's the whole reason baseball cards exist, right? To keep track of and commemorate baseball history? I'm not going to recap Blake's summaries, but may add bits of insight here and there. With that, I give you the Spot Starter's Cup Of Coffee Tigers, in cardboard form.

Earl Averill
1940 Play Ball #46 Earl Averill


Play Ball gets it, just look at the bottom of the card: "A pictoral news record of America's favorite sport". I dare you to define baseball cards better then that.

This card is one of two cards of Earl as a Tiger. The other, a 1939 "Sportservice Tigers" is so obscure that I have no idea what I am even looking for. Play Ball is a legitimate and well known set, on the other hand. The back makes mention of the Earl Averill acquisition:
The Indians, who paid a reported price of $50,000 for Averill in 1929, traded the outfielder to the Detroit Tigers in June last year and while Earl was not up to his par in hitting, he managed to drive in 65 runs with 98 hits, almost half of them for extra bases.


Update: Mark of Mark's Ephemera, in addition to editing my posts, sent me a link about the obscure 1939 set. A little extra research indicates that this set was released by the Tigers and is a 1939-1940 set and is listed as either one, the other, or both. More specifically, 1939 was the first year that SportService was the Detroit Tigers' official concessionaire, which leads me to believe that the cards were essentially corporately sponsored by them, despite being considered a "team-issue". The more you know...

Steve Avery
I loved Steve Avery growing up. He was a Michigander and he was a rising star on the Braves, which for whatever reason, I always liked as a kid. Well, the two worlds converged, briefly, in 2003.

2003 Topps Traded #T42 Steve Avery


Why the Tigers in 2003? The back of the card gives us some insight on this one.
"At the urging of his son, this former Braves star tried a comeback in 2003 after being out of baseball for two years. He signed with his hometown Tigers, beat Atlanta in Spring Training and won a spot in Detroit's pen."

That's neat.

Billy Bean and Billy Beane
The first, and less notable, actually had enough of a presence on the Tigers to warrant a card.
1988 Topps #267 Billy Bean


The other Billy Beane, well known for being the current GM of the A's and the man behind Moneyball, had such a short stint in Detroit that they didn't even bother to make a card for him. He did have a lasting legacy in that other role, however:


Rico Brogna
The last of this group of shortly tenured Tigers is a once rising star in the system:


Rico was a big deal. He got a coveted "top prospects" card in 1992 with a couple of guys who went on to have solid careers (Klesko and Jaha). A bunch of prospect cards preceded that 1992 version as well. In 1993 he got one of his own:

1993 Topps #598 Rico Brogna


This was one of many cards that Brogna had as a Tiger, dating back to 1989. In fact his 1991 Upper Deck card was the one that stuck out with me, but I didn't remember that when I was rushing to pull cards this morning, so Topps it is. This card, the 1993 version, was the end of the brief Rico Brogna era in Detroit and you know that he was only up for a cup of coffee--he is wearing an away uniform and home helmet, a telltale sign of a Spring Training picture, indicating that there wasn't much in the way of regular season game action for him.

And so concludes Part 1. Part 2 is now up at the Spot Starters, and I'll be chasing down those cards just as soon as I can.